Click here for shortcuts to regional language blogs and city-specific events.
The world is truly dynamic and I appreciate that. There is a constant endeavour on the part of linguists to coin more sensitised terms, gender neutral terms and more respectable and inclusive phrases and terms.
It is heartening to know the constant work that is going on to make language more and more respectful and sensitised but I think we have gone too far in introducing the term Child-Free for couples who choose not to have children..
I have a number of objections to that... Are children some disease that not having them makes you free?
Secondly, who says having children is imperative, it is a matter of free will anyways whereas the term Child-free means free from some obligation which is compulsory..
Child free is derogatory to Children themselves. It clearly indicates that not having children gives freedom and liberation. Such a notion is quite insensitive and anti social to my mind.. It is a disregard for the institution of parenting, motherhood and the joy of raising a child..
I am not trying to indicate that I am pro children or anti children.. What I totally object to is the polarisation of people in the world who have children and those who don't .
I think we should leave children alone when it comes to categorisation....
One must think about it!!!